By

RULE OF THIRDS, and beyond

When it comes to composition, photographers seem to fall into a few distinct camps. Some barely give it a thought. Others rely on the tried-and-true “Rule of Thirds” and feel content with that. And then there is a smaller, more meticulous group who realize that geometry and layout are far more intricate than a few intersecting lines.

Using grids and patterns to guide your composition can completely transform your images. These tools are not rigid rules. They are starting points, hints that help you see potential in a frame. Do not let yourself become a slave to tiny intersections; instead, use them to explore, experiment, and make deliberate choices.

My Sony Alpha A99V has a built-in “Rule of Thirds” grid, but it does not offer other types of grids. Even so, I often reference alternative grids and spirals, both when shooting and later in post-processing. They help me balance the frame in ways the camera’s standard overlay cannot.

Starting simple is easy. The Rule of Thirds divides a frame into three equal rows and columns. The magic happens at the intersections, where our eyes naturally gravitate. Placing points of interest here gives your images a subtle sense of balance and harmony without ever feeling forced.

 

The Rule of Thirds splits a frame into three equal rows and three equal columns. Key points of interest are best placed where these lines intersect.

The Golden Section, also known as the Phi Grid or Golden Phi, divides the frame in a similar way, but instead of equal sections, it follows the proportions of the golden ratio.

Rule of Thirds and Golden Section is ridged in their definition and do not allow for much artistic freedom. A new method emerged from these two methods, Diagonal method also known as Angled Bisections. Instead of idea of having the points of interest firmly at intersecting lines, the diagonal puts the points of interest at diagonals emerging from each corner.

The Fibonacci Spiral shows that structured grids are not the only way to guide composition. By aligning points of interest along the spiral, you still have plenty of creative freedom. Typically, the main subject is placed at the center of the spiral. This pattern often sparks debate, myths, and exaggerated claims. For example, it is sometimes said that the Nautilus shell is built on this “divine” number, which is not true. Despite the myths, the Fibonacci Spiral remains a powerful tool for creating compositions that are naturally pleasing to the eye.


So where is the truth? My claim is that it is nowhere and everywhereJ. Following ridged rules of placing interest will not guarantee you achieving a perfect composition. Many times it is the break away from the rules that yields the better photo. That being said is composition techniques a great starting point, and combining the techniques is the result often much better. In the example below is the Diagonal method taking base on the Golden Mean, combined with the Fibonacci Spiral.



This final example is by Ivan Del Negro

3 responses to “RULE OF THIRDS, and beyond”

  1. […] post is about getting Photoshop to help us crop our photos after these Composition/Proportion rules. There is two ways of doing this; one is using the built-in functionality, and the other extending […]

  2. Patrick Mitchell avatar

    THIS IS VERY INTERESTING But lets us look at the situation in a form of humanity if in fact we see on a 50mm form the when we see this as dual view and make the equation then the lines of actual view can either be reduced or increased as sight is actually different thus reduced view or increased view when using both eyes to sight through the camera the greatest computer of all creates a view that we recognize as a complete it not its the brain making adjustments thus many of the rules actually are recomputed and when the original line of sight is seen the original view is readjusted mechanically thus in the end using a mechanical version 8x 10 rule of thirds test looking through your camera both eyes open your line of sight is actually different then you teach your brain to see differently Aim You camera but dont look through it take the photo then try and see end lines up down side to side your field of view and then see hat happens it becomes very interesting thus do 2 people actually see the same thing naturally

    1. The human eye is giving view of 55degrees, the same as a 43mm lens provides. That said, I doubt there is two of us build totally alike. but the way we look at a picture should be fairly equal.

Leave a Reply to Patrick MitchellCancel reply

About the blog

RAW is a WordPress blog theme design inspired by the Brutalist concepts from the homonymous Architectural movement.

Get updated

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive our very latest news.

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨

Discover more from The Golden Hour

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading